#AI #GenerativeAI #AIRegulation #RuleOfLaw: "In the thick of AI’s promises to secure a better future, there may well be something unique about AI that requires specific, focused regulation when it comes to its application in the justice system. AI’s adaptability, powered by advanced pattern-matching capabilities that draw out novel insights from massive datasets, creates an acceleration effect. Its speed and perceived reliability risk transforming potential answers into concrete outcomes with worrying ease. Deploying AI-powered tools developed by private industry within the legal sphere, especially the administrative state, requires thinking hard about balance. Achieving the appropriate balance will require thinking through the degree of impact we want to allow corporate entities to have within our public institutions. We risk undue corporate influence, coupled with automation bias, through overreliance on AI-powered tools. Those risks are simply too high when it comes to the cornerstone of functioning democracies — a transparent and robust legal system that aims to guarantee just outcomes to its citizens through the Rule of Law."
https://www.justsecurity.org/103777/maintaining-the-rule-of-law-in-the-age-of-ai/
@remixtures I appreciate the depth and clarity with which you have covered this topic. The acceleration effect of AI's pattern recognition capabilities is a fascinating and concerning, especially when applied to the justice system. Your point that we need to consider what influence we allow the private sector to have over our public institutions makes me think, wouldn't it be better to only use #OpenSourceAI in the public sector?
Thanks for this insightful article. #Justice #PublicSector
In theory, I'd fully agree.
But #OSI is rushing to open wash any black box with [a new "Open Source AI" that nobody want (except BigTech)](https://samjohnston.org/2024/10/15/the-osi-lacks-competence-to-define-open-source-ai/).
