Copyright law could be AI's achilles heel. But what will it take for the NYT and other plaintiffs to actually win their cases?
We talked to half a dozen IP and tech law experts about the thorny legal doctrine at the heart of the cases -- fair use -- and how courts might apply it to AI. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/01/04/nyt-ai-copyright-lawsuit-fair-use/
ChatGPT is a subset of AI. The “thorny issue” of ChatGPT has nothing to do with the broader category of AI that applies to revolutionary use cases in climate science, genetics and cybersecurity to name a few. And the copyright issues with ChatGPT will likely be straitened out. I guess all the “AI will be the end of humanity” clickbait panic has run course? Too bad this is behind a paywall. I’m sure it’s informative. 😒
