Follow

Now let's look what Z-bloggers have to say about the hit on the Su-57

In short, they confirm the defeat of the latest fifth-generation fighter Su-57 and fume about it. A unique aircraft was damaged as a result of a Ukrainian drone strike on the airfield in Akhtubinsk:

“Yes, yesterday the airfield in Akhtubinsk was attacked by a UAV. 3 pieces arrived. The Su-57 was damaged by shrapnel; it is now being determined whether it can be restored or not. If not, then this will be the first Su-57 combat loss in history .

I'll tell you again. For the price of this Su-57 alone, shelters against UAVs could be built for all the operational-tactical aircraft of the country. Of course, if you don’t fuck them up along the way and don’t give out kickbacks. And there would still be some left for Laos,” - FighterBomber.

“The Su-57 is really damaged, Ukrainian drones flew to the airfield. The extent of the damage is still unclear ,” - “Belarusian security officer.”

“...a Ukrainian drone took out the latest Su -57 fighter at the airfield in Akhtubinsk (Astrakhan region). The plane, worth under $100 million, was not protected by anything ,” - “Russian Letters.”

“Satellite image of a damaged Su-57 in Akhtubinsk after the arrival of Ukrainian drones, traces of which can be seen nearby.
There were not even normal hangars in the country even for several units of fifth-generation aircraft. Apparently, a hangar is more expensive than the most modern fighter. Almost 600 kilometers from the front line, by the way.”-"Milinfolive"

@freerussia_report

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.