🏳️🌈🖖🏽
So let me get this straight. The Supreme Court is only supposed to take cases where there is a real injury and real controversy, but it took the case of a web designer who faked a request by a gay customer for a website design? The guy was actually straight, married and with kids?
Vacate this case.
Follow
@georgetakei By the same token SCOTUS is not supposed to consider non-contested issues. Had the state challenged the facts of the case, it might never have made it to SCOTUS, but the state stipulated that it agreed with the facts as presented and that the only controversy was the matter of law. SCOTUS ruled on based the facts that the parties agreed were not in dispute (even if they were not real).
