Anyway if Jack Dorsey wants to talk about his bullshit blockchain company who the fuck cares, right?
Just don't watch the talk?
I do not see the point in disrupting the talk with protests.
+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄
@SuperDicq his bullshit "savior of the people" larp is annoying. he's a violent criminal like every other commie: "sit in" isn't "peaceful protest" on someone elses property. if he wants to do a sit in he should stay on his couch.
I agree about the "saviour of the people larp" though. That's a perfect description of what he seems to be like.
@taylan @SuperDicq no it's consequent in applying principles. he by force prevents the owners of the property to use it as they intend to. that's violence.
@taylan @SuperDicq proper way would be to ask fosdem for a slot to do a discussion on the points of disagreement. somehow i never see socialists do that, it's always just screaming and ruining the work of others. cf. talks of people like peterson where a bunch of people storms the stage or screams around in the audience.
if someone proposes a discussion the "protesters" make up reasons to decline like that either they can't discuss because the other side is evil or that the other side would not properly discuss. fully aware their ideology doesn't hold water and would collapse given the most basic scrutiny. it's a religion after all.
@bonifartius@qoto.org I wouldn't call him a violent criminal. Simply sitting on property that isn't yours is not very violent behavior.
I think he's simply just being an entitled prick to be honest.
@SuperDicq i think violent behavior is like pregnant or dead: a little bit pregnant, a little bit dead, a little bit violent.
doesn't take away from that he's an entitled prick, of course ;)
Come on. Calling someone a "violent criminal" for an obnoxious protest is almost as clownish as the obnoxious protest itself.