+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄
at least here in germanistan, everyone arguing against the AfD using "the constitution" hasn't read the constitution.
the so called constitution is pretty clear that a party is a completely different beast from other organizations. it can only be banned by the highest federal court. that's it. it's unlawful to have a party observed by a secret service.
this special treatment for parties is PRECISELY because the actual nazis banned other parties.
days since the hall monitors break their own rules: 0️⃣
@bonifartius in durcheinanderland geht alles
@spinneria ist halt wieder ein klassischer fall für lysander spooner:
> What, then, is legislation? It is an assumption by one man, or body of men, of absolute, irresponsible dominion over all other men whom they can subject to their power. It is the assumption by one man, or body of men, of a right to subject all other men to their will and their service. It is the assumption by one man, or body of men, of a right to abolish outright all the natural rights, all the natural liberty of all other men; to make all other men their slaves; to arbitrarily dictate to all other men what they may, and may not, do; what they may, and may not, have; what they may, and may not, be. It is, in short, the assumption of a right to banish the principle of human rights, the principle of justice itself, from off the earth, and set up their own personal will, pleasure, and interest in its place. All this, and nothing less, is involved in the very idea that there can be any such thing as human legislation that is obligatory upon those upon whom it is imposed.
@bonifartius gibt auch interessante forschungen darüber das gesellschaften über 200 mitglieder nicht mehr friedlich funktionieren
der mensch scheint doch ein stammes wesen zu sein
was als lebensgrundlage den stamm braucht und zum austausch andere stämme -
diversität und so 😉