Copyright claims can’t be the gatekeeper to the internet. EFF urges SCOTUS to apply patent-law limits and stop overbroad secondary liability. eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-

US politics (Charlie Kirk) 

"I do not mean that words can be violence, in the way some progressives have claimed for the past 15 years. I mean that if we fail to distinguish between productive and unproductive speech, we’re missing a huge part of why the internet generations are losing faith in words to begin with."

"Do not lionize debate theater" by Andrew Doris in Exasperated Alien exasperatedalien.substack.com/

US politics 

"If I'm forced to name a silver lining, it’s that liberalism is countercultural again. Donald Trump and the populist, postliberal Right are in power. An illiberal hostility to basic liberties and a cynicism toward progress flourish, albeit in a less coordinated fashion, on the left — this is the moment to strike back."

"How do we live with each other" by Jerusalem Demsas in The Argument theargumentmag.com/p/how-do-we

This piece in Slow Boring about Denver restaurants (unsurprisingly) sparked a debate about American norms: slowboring.com/p/denver-piece

There was one tidbit raised in the comments that surprised me: Noodles & Company, a Denver-based chain, has a "no tips" policy. Well, I just happened to be in Denver and ate there (location on the 16th Street Mall downtown, for reference), and I never saw anything to that effect. The payment terminal prompted me to select a tip before providing my card, and I did leave a tip there.

I think restaurants adopting a no-tip model voluntarily is the way to go here, but if that's the way they want to go they should try to ensure that the tip option doesn't appear on the terminal.

"...a somewhat annoying habit has developed where scientists will weigh-in on questions related to Covid NPIs or climate policy that involve complicated multi-dimensional tradeoffs as if 'the science' settles rather than informs these debates. This is bad."

Not the main idea of this piece but I'm highlighting it because I remember saying essentially the exact same thing a while ago.

"Trump's war on science" by Matthew Yglesias in Slow Boring slowboring.com/p/trumps-war-on

The USPTO is making it harder to challenge bad patents. That’s great for patent trolls—terrible for everyone else. eff.org/deeplinks/2025/03/new-

US politics (DEI) 

"...none of these five dogmas is entirely false. The problem is that they are not entirely true either, as a result of which their widespread promulgation generates completely unnecessary suspicion and controversy."

"The Five Dogmas of DEI" by Joseph Heath in Persuasion persuasion.community/p/the-fiv

US politics 

"In my view, the right lesson from 2024 is that presidential elections are not about policy in the first place. ...[I]nsofar as election outcomes can be controlled, winning probably has more to do with charisma, authenticity, relatability, and responsiveness to the national mood, all of which can be leveraged in service of almost any policy platform."

"Move past the progressive v. moderate framing" from Exasperated Alien exasperatedalien.substack.com/

I've noticed a few times where people reference a account as simply "@ example" instead of (I assume) "@ example.bsky.social". Bluesky handles are domain names, so it's important to distinguish between, say, example.bsky.social and example.com.

Also, I again encourage anyone who's using Bluesky and has their own domain name/website to look into making it their handle instead of just relying on bsky.social.

US politics 

"What Went Wrong In The 2024 Election?" by Ryan Beard youtube.com/watch?v=KPTQWEoKz_

As Beard says, it's not the most significant factor in Trump's victory, but it's honestly refreshing to hear the left-wing infighting being called out by someone to my left. I'm reminded of Freddie deBoer's criticism of a certain section of social-justice advocates who believe they are "exempt from politics" ( freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/s ); Beard's criticism of certain online leftists seems similar.

I have been making a conscious effort to Post About Politics less post-Twitter. I no longer feel convinced blasting fancy words to people who don't care, already agree with me, already voted, or are German citizens, is helpful.

But this election is making me feel torn apart (if Harris loses, it may no longer be safe for me to move back to the USA) so if you feel personally open to listening to someone's pitch on the election, here are some spoiler-tagged tiny arguments for the night before:

The Vanishing Culture report arrives today at a critical moment: While Internet Archive recovers from a cyberattack, it’s a reminder of how fragile our access to knowledge can be. Preserving culture & history requires resilience—and collective action.

🔗 blog.archive.org/2024/10/30/va

The Internet Archive was breached again, this time on their Zendesk email support platform after repeated warnings that threat actors stole exposed GitLab authentication tokens.

bleepingcomputer.com/news/secu

"Why kick the cat?" - @brewsterkahle, speaking to Daniel Wu of the Washington Post about the attacks against the Internet Archive ➡️ wapo.st/4f998w2

The usefulness of blocks after this change will depend on how you use the block function and to what ends.

Show thread

Is it just me or are some people misunderstanding the upcoming changes to 's block function? There's certainly legitimate criticism to be made, but I think it's important to recognize what is actually changing and what isn't.

Currently, if you block someone, that means:

1. You can't see their posts
2. You can't interact with their posts
3. They can't see your posts
4. They can't interact with your posts

Only #3 is changing.

Curious about whether Mastodon automatically links bare domain names like example.com or links without schemas like example.com/some/page.html

Culture war (transgender) 

In the spirit of "fronting the 'of course' a little more" as Freddie deBoer puts it ( freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/p ):

I believe trans people should be free to live their lives as their identified gender and receive the healthcare they need (and I don't just mean gender-affirming care; this also extends to things like gynecological care for trans men which from my understanding can be a struggle). Trans people deserve the same protections against discrimination as others do with regards to sex and gender and they absolutely do not deserve harassment, ostracism, and violence simply for identifying in a particular way.

Show thread
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.