An interesting Letter to the Editor in CMI. It actually makes 2 separate but related points: 🧵
1) States the benefits of authors re-using peer review performed by other journals, even in the case of paper rejects. It points out the importance of honesty by the authors (though presumably journals can talk to each and also share that information).
#academicchatter #PeerReview @academicchatter (1/2)
https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(23)00364-6/fulltext?dgcid=raven_jbs_aip_email
The other point is a more generic one: 🧵
2) that universities should begin to take into account the amount of peer review that academics do as part of their performance evaluation / assessment for promotion, etc...
#academicchatter #PeerReview @academicchatter #academia (2/2)
https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(23)00364-6/fulltext?dgcid=raven_jbs_aip_email
