Follow

'Under the publication conditions presented above, we claim that the current publication system can distort Open Science, by presenting a vision of Open Science that fails to consider the need for quality inherent in scientific production. We especially argue that scientific publishers, but also institutions, tend to confound Open Science and Open Access, underfunding the quality control of data while overfunding Open Access, without sufficiently consulting the researcher community on global scientific objectives. We call for greater cautiousness when dealing with the promotion of Open Science, and a stronger reliance on Open Science practices by and for researchers instead of by institutions and publishers and for publishers.'
open-research-europe.ec.europa

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.