@dataKnightmare@octodon.social @DrewKadel > LLMs by design are incapable of associating a likelihood value to their output.
> Their output is totally randomly

Sorry, but this is just false. The probability space of "totally random" output is unimaginably huge and most of it not just false, but complete gibberish. Throw a 26-sided dice a few times and compare that totally random result to the GPT output.

To navigate it *at all* requires calculating likelihood and picking only up the sensible stuff.

So "associating a likelihood value to their output" is exactly like the thing works.