let's assume a crypt*****ency uses proof-of-stake, therefore not wasting the scarce energy as a proof-of-work-based bloc***ains do and the exchanges are still required by the states to check the IDs of the users just as any financial institution what exactly do they offer with this then? using a merkle tree by itself isn't a problem, say git and nix do this too, but the question is why even bother
@dpwiz AFAIR it's orthogonal to the currencies themselves, it's just a payment system working with any of them, crypto- or not CCs are more about competing with the central banks, but I'm not sure what exactly they even offer, given the same regulations imposed on the exchanges
@dpwiz e.g. the people behind #Tezos seem pretty dedicated and at least are using the right technology, but I don't quite get what they even strive for: if the exchange says "you're in a high-risk country and therefore fuck off", it doesn't matter that it's crypto-
re: hype-related
CCs are more about competing with the central banks, but I'm not sure what exactly they even offer, given the same regulations imposed on the exchanges