Quds News: ICJ rules by overwhelming majority:
⭕️ Israel must halt attacks on Palestinians
⭕️ Halt incitement against Palestinians as a group
⭕️Ensure Humanitarian aid
⭕️Preserve evidence
⭕️ Submit response to the court within 1 month
⭕️ All parties bound by international humanitarian law
⭕️Calls for release of Hamas held hostages in Gaza @israel @palestine
https://x.com/qudsnen/status/1750863344511209937?s=12&t=uM8me4uwdP7D0z4nanVVuw
https://nitter.net/qudsnen/status/1750863344511209937?s=12&t=uM8me4uwdP7D0z4nanVVuw
@Sherifazuhur @simon_brooke um, I'm getting very contradictory information on the first point at least. perhaps best to read the judgement.
@DetersHenning @Sherifazuhur @simon_brooke
Well, "There’s a new version of this post."
https://twitter.com/QudsNen/status/1750868389516513304
But who cares, as long as one can spread the original.
@dpwiz @Sherifazuhur @simon_brooke I think the confusion arises from the section of the judgement that demands that Israel refrains from "killing members of the group", but this is to be understood in the context of Article II of the Genocide Convention, where it refers to killings "with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group".
@DetersHenning @Sherifazuhur @simon_brooke I have a feeling that the post is intended to specifically* support "the court ordered a ceasefire" narrative, with a follow up of "Israel violates the court decision".
*) Given how the first point is phrased and then amended.
@DetersHenning I've been following arabic media for a while and, unfortunately, this is par for the course. Every trick you can find in psyops book is deployed at large.
@dpwiz maybe, but I'm trying to be charitable.