Yet another airport blocking SSH (and Wireguard) on their WiFi. Thanks for nothing, Stansted.
Follow

@noodles I really need to setup both on ports 80 and 443 with a protocol proxy

@falken I used to have a separate IP that did SSH on 443 (and IPoDNS), but it's been mostly unnecessary for some time and the extra IP started to cost so I dropped it. Not entirely convinced about any of the 443 proxy stuff I've seen, given an existing busy webserver.

@noodles Does IPv6 work there? At least then extra IPs wouldn't cost.

@falken

@edavies @falken Ha ha ha. I don't remember ever seeing public WiFi with working v6.

@noodles my ISP (the awesome ) gives me a small IPv4 block for free, and I've never done much with it. Better to setup and not need than the reverse I think

@noodles

Multiplex ssh and https based on whether or not the evil bit is set? It might even be considered rfc compliant..

@seanfurey I don't think I have any faith that networks that block ports by default will pass random bits though. I am pondering some sort of HTTPS based port knocking that then diverts port 80 or 443 connections, however.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.