walking is not more efficient than driving.

calories for a group of four to walk a mile (as opposed to sitting): ~400 [1]

gallons of gas to drive one mile: ~1/25 [2]

the amount of energy used to grow food (not even including transportation) relative to the amount of energy the food contains is about 10:1 [3]

amount of energy in one gallon of gasoline: ~31,000 calories [4]

therefore, amount of gas energy to walk somewhere is 4,000 calories for four people. to drive, it's only 1,240. so driving is 3-4x as efficient as walking!

[1] https://www.verywellfit.com/walking-calories-burned-by-miles-3887154#calories-burned-per-mile
[2] https://www.epa.gov/automotive-trends/highlights-automotive-trends-report
[3] https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/10-calories-in-1-calorie-out-the-energy-we-spend-on-food/
[4] https://health.howstuffworks.com/wellness/diet-fitness/weight-loss/calorie1.htm
Follow

@mewmew you included the energy required to produce the energy the walkers used... Should you do the same for the gasoline? Extraction, refinement, transportation... Amortized production of the vehicle. Pollution.

I would think the energy used in building roads would amortize down to nothing, but the valuable real estate taken up by road in some places certainly has a cost. If only considering energy efficiency, consider that folks might not have to walk a mile if things were closer together.

@finity the energy involved in producing the food *is gasoline*. it's a gasoline-to-gasoline comparison

@mewmew wow! Yeah. That scientific american article points that out. Thanks, very interesting.

@mewmew that's just how inefficient our massive food production system is. We gotta get things on electric and get the grid more sustainable.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.