Follow

@mrmcmayhem@noagendasocial.com No democrat voter has specifically complained about needing an ID at 30, nor have they complained about the burden on themselves personally. The argument from the democrats has always consistently been that ID laws would unduly restrict the destitute, poor, homeless, and the older retired population from being able to vote. I think it should be rather obvious why that is the case.

I am not arguing for or against ID laws here mind you. But if you want my stance its simple. Require IDs, sure, but ALSO make obtaining IDs absolutely free, and not require an address. If someone doesnt have the paper work like a birth certificate but legally is allowed one that process would also need to be free. IF all of that is true then ID laws make perfect sense, if not then obviously ID laws would infringe on the right of many citizens to vote.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.