I have been following this conversation for a while now:
https://qoto.org/@zeccano/103205964102778422
@freemo, problem is that @zeccano does not understand what "relative to" and the "frame of reference" are or mean.
Without understanding this, it's all total waste of time.
It's also painfully obvious, when you bring up the bus and the ball.
I am not sure why zeccano cant (or refuses) to understand that if I send you a photon, while we both move, I see it travelling in a straight line from me to you and you see the same.
Now, for someone OUTSIDE of our frame, the photon moves diagonally relative to his reference point.
Exactly what happens if I was standing on a bridge, looking down at the bus and those 2 kids towing a ball to each other.
This is where people screw up. They mix the frames of reference where events occur and where they are - outside of it.
It's like they refuse to understand you can have a frame inside a frame.
This is also causes the confusion about why the laws of physics remain the same in all inertial frames of reference.
🇳🇱
You were asked not to tag me again until your ready to learn the math.. If you continue your account will be suspended from our instance entirely, last warning.
That was intentional, as I have little interest in dealing with people who willfully choose not to learn the things they have opinions on.
If it werent for your willful ignorance and unwillingness to do the work to confirm or deny your own absurdities as I said you are little more than a waste of time.
I will now be silencing your account at the instance level. Be aware from this point on myself and anyone else on QOTO will unable to receive your messages.
