Science is supposed to answer the HOW. Just claiming that it happens DESPITE it being IRRATIONAL and against all logic, is unacceptable for me.
Armed with your best explanations and having the world phsyicists behind you, its stramge that you cant present a convincing case,
There are too many leaps of faith required to accept SR. ad too many contradictions in the hypothesis.
For this reason I reserve judgement on any claimed experimental evidence that supports the hypothesis.
You have hardly thrashed my concerns with anything rational.
The best you have is that it just works somehow, and the results of the equations seem to fit the observations.
As Feynman said, a correct answer is not proof.
Im done with this, you have been unable to supply any slam dunk defense for a highly suspect hypothesis.
Thanks for trying though.
🇳🇱
It does answer the how (though the deeper you go the more unanswered questions).
Dont confuse the fact that no one is willing to talk to you or explain to you how due to your obnoxious personality as being the same as there not being an answer.
@freemo To give me something to read, give me a link that explain the HOW please.
Ive not come across any info like that.
@zeccano No links, I learned from actual math, and experimentation, university level sources. I wish i had a youtube link for you off hand.
If you wish to get serious about it then the next step down for you would be to study the permiability of free space, wave equations, and maxwell's equations. These three facts will give you the next level down the rabbit hole with regards to "why/how".
Keep in mind like all why/how questions on any subject, the question is infinitely recursive.
Here is feynman's remark about "why" questions that explains what I'm talking about: https://youtu.be/Dp4dpeJVDxs
@zeccano I am not answering more questions nor go down a rabit hole with you.
If you change your attitude, or make an attempt to do so, I will happily speak with you until the universe ends from heat death.
But if you want me to continue futher you abslutely must get that ego in check, be aware you simply dont understand a lot rather than assert you think you know. Approach things in a way where your trying to understand what others claim to be true, rather than trying to prove something to be true you made up and dont understand.
If you make that change in how you approach all this then i will answer your questions and we can talk futher. Until you do then as i said, I'm done.
@freemo
Tell me this:
Maxwell concluded that light was an electromagnetic effect, based on only the fact that both his calculation for the speed of an electron happened to be similar to the speed someone else discovered?
Thats possibly just coincidental that they both have the same speed, its not proof that are one in the same energies.
Light is unaffected by magnetism or electricity, but it should be.
Magnetism is unaffected by any type of radiation. yet it should be.
Both light and other radiation may have some almost symbiotic like relationship to electricity, but that still does not mean that are the same.Maxwell assumed they were the same.