Since everyone wants to talk about taking away gun rights again...

🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱  
@hansw@mastodon.social Great I think that will giveus a foundation to work with. So Now ill provide some data, let me explain a bit how the grange...

@freemo No. They want to take away automatic weapons from people with mental issues.

People like you and me will be happy owners of the needed rocket launchers for personal defense against bears.

@pthenq1 No, what the hell are you talking about... automatic weapons have been illegal since the 70s.

@freemo They said nothing about "taking away gun rights again". But if you are going to twist what they said, why could I not twist what you said? 👀

@pthenq1 yes they did, they are talking about banning certain types of guns, therefore taking away our right to access to those guns.

@freemo okay. I support the right of get weapons.

Still, nobody can get always the guns they want. Today, for example, I would like portable small atomic bombs. You know, the ones handy to blow up 1 or 2 blocks.

They do not let us put our hands on that... and other weapons.

@pthenq1 Its even illegal for nations to have nuclear weapons, even the ones that have it arent allowed to as they were required to disarm ages ago and didnt... so no, bad example buddy.

@freemo same story. When/If they declare some weapon illegal and you have it, you will have to surrender it.

Other than that, perhaps someone wants a semiautomatic to defend himself from bears.

I want a nuclear mini-nuke to combat field mices. We are all tuned against dangerous environments... :awesome:

@pthenq1 @freemo the constitution bans ex post facto laws. since guns are property (and not under some 'license' shitbaggery like the losers in canada) it can't be "bought back" without basically violating the constitution.
Follow

@icedquinn

Yup, they can only prevent people buying new ones, or the making of new ones... freedom baby!

@pthenq1

@freemo @pthenq1 They can't even do either of those things. You have a right to keep and bear arms :blobcatshrug2:

SCOTUS had just refused to hear cases because they are useless idiots.
@freemo @pthenq1
> as is necessary for a well regulated militia
they really desperately want to interpret this as a loophole to inject all their gun grabs
> the right to keep and bear arms
:blobcat:
> shall not be infringed
they have a hard time understanding how not infringing works.

and this is an enumerated right, meaning the tenth amendment cannot even give states the privilege to gun control you.

they only do it because SCOTUS is literally worthless and won't hear cases. which basically is itself a violation of your right to due process. which they can also just refuse to hear cases on.

remind me why we haven't spaced them
@icedquinn @freemo @pthenq1 Technically if we refuse to take a crime to trial, it isn't illegal, because of innocent until proven guilty, so actually the government did nothing wrong!
@galena in my non-lawyer legal opinion, refusing to hear cases about how someones rights are violated is itself a violation of the constitution.

i tend to have very harsh opinions judges who commit acts of bullshit.

@freemo @pthenq1
@icedquinn @freemo @pthenq1 We can't know for sure until the court hears your case on whether or not refusing to hear cases is a violation of your constitutional rights. Sorry bud, but the court refuses to hear your case, I guess we'll never know!
@galena it would be a shame if we passed a law that fired all the judges. @freemo @pthenq1
@icedquinn @galena @freemo @pthenq1 In some legal systems, a notice has to be issued in reasonable time. This notice grants opens up the option for another authority to assume the role of prosecutor. This is a modern safeguard against the situation where the state refuses to investigate, gather evidence and then says 'we aren't prosecuting on the grounds of insufficient evidence'. I'm not a lawyer either btw but this is the situation in South Africa at least.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.