@freemo Methodical as he was, I think Tolkien also very much wanted to depict certain mysteries as essentially unknowable, for deliberate literary effect. In that sense, I believe Tolkien meant for Bombadil to be, in his deepest nature, someone about whom the reader is invited to speculate endlessly, but in such a way that no single and definite conclusion will ever be entirely satisfactory. See https://dc.swosu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2896&context=mythlore
@tym
Perhaps. But i recall him once saying that bombafil did represent something but he wanted it to be a mystery
@freemo I hope you’ll find it as interesting as I did. One of the better things I’ve come across on the subject.