I would support tax paid free education for a persons entire life until the day they die, over tax paid universal healthcare anyday.

The world is overcrowded anyway, last thing we need is healthcare making it more crowded. Smart people on the other hand, those are a rare commodity, we need as many of them as we can get.

@freemo hmmmm thats very interesting... what r ur thoughts on the single tax (LVT)?

@cee I am strongly against taxing held assets. income tax is ok, but i dont think its the best approach to tax either. If it were up to me all tax would be in the form of sales tax with various tax grades for how much a luxury something is (with bare essentials not being taxed).

@freemo so like GST?
i mean, i can understand the logic, (although one could argue that income taxes and tariffs could trigger inflation).

The Georgist argument would be that, the LVT is a temporary measure used to break up land monopolies (prevents landlords from artificially jacking up the rent) and underutilised land could be put to good use. So instead of having to fork out a fortune from interest by the central banks through real estate, you'll end paying less on tax and land gets to be legally held under ur name.

@cee I generally would address monopolies through antitrust laws. If one person owns 95% of the land across the whole country (or even in just a really large region) then yea, probably a need to break it up. But this is rarely the case. It is usually land owned by many people rich and poor all competing with each other. This isnt a monopoly.

What seems like poor reasoning here is that they wind up taxing **everyone** in the hopes of breaking up monopolies that probably either dont exist in the first place, or if they do exist should be targeted without harming ordinary land owners.

@freemo The queen of england has a monopoly on Australian land still ๐Ÿคฎ

Ohhhh, ur coming at it from that angle. So what Georgists and Geo-libertarians are actually hoping to accomplish is to abolish Propertarianism (landlords) completely. Since land rent requires economic coercion; the thing is, even if we were to establish anti-trust laws here in Australia (99.9% of landlords here break the law irregardless and still get away with it)), having a royal commission only occurs when things get to worst case scenario (we dont want it to get to that point, we want to prevent that).

The rlly messed up thing is that landlords are horrendous when it comes to dealing with mold outbreaks.

@icedquinn

@cee

Of course she has a monopoly on england, you guys are an english colony afterall. You are just lucky she lets you guys live there instead of the prison building she built for you all :)

As an american might I suggest you guys throwing some of her tea in the ocean, I know from personal expiernce the only way to piss off the english is to fuck with their tea :)

Me personally, I'd be strongly against completely abolishing landlords, to do so in any effective way you'd need to abolish land ownership, if you dont then landlords will just own the land still but use it for other purposes and not let anyone live on it.

Sounds to me the issue you guys have is exactly what I said, your anti-trust laws just arent enforced when they should be.

Also if mold is a problem then sounds like you need either better tenet laws or to have them enforced more.

@icedquinn

@freemo
What a lot of us are afraid u see is, if we were to secede from the Commonwealth, we will have a civil war, which would just be a proxy war between the US backed Eastern states and the Chinese backed West. Like BRUH, we lost the Great Emu War, i doubt we'll do any better in a proxy Civil War ๐Ÿคฃ

Im not going full on Proudhon and go "all property is theft", i'm still very much for collective and individual property, it's just that landlords kill the free market and destroys small businesses.

> you need either better tenet laws or to have them enforced more.

hm, thats why i find Geo-Syndicalism appealing... and we do have Tenants Associations; will have to discuss more with me old mates from the SocDem unions

@icedquinn
Follow

@cee

I dont think we disagree that there is a problem with landlords per se. I mean I dont know Australia well enough to say but I wont disagree. We just disagree on how to solve it. Your approach to me sounds like it makes the proposed problems much worse (and you havent convinced me otherwise), therefore, I would opt for other solutions.

@icedquinn

ยท ยท 0 ยท 0 ยท 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.