🇳🇱
@freemo
None. He has circulation problems related to his age.
Like a notebook running on batteries needing periodic charges.
And he doesn't have terrorists around. He doesn't create insurrections either and he is loyal to the constitution.
@pthenq1 Well for starters if you call violence against the government buildings in DC as insurrection, then the democrats engaged insurrection first, going so far as requiring Trump to be taken to a secure bunker when a democratic "insurrection" threatened his life.
Second, the circulation problems sounds like Vascular dementia to me then, so ill go with that :)
@freemo
They killed people and stormed the capitol to stop an election certification. They were searching for the vice president to hang him.
100 % insurrection
And whoever supports that are supporting an insurrection.
@pthenq1 Everyone who died at the incident were trump supporters. One cop died several days later, but thats it.
Moreover the democrats were actively trying to kill trump going as far as using bricks as weapons. Either they are both 100% insurrection or neither were. Democrats literally burned buildings and homes to the ground for the better part of a year. No way in hell you can justify them as the good guys.
@freemo
I understand the cops killed were not republicans or democrats. They were Americans protecting the Congress on duty.
And they were killed like dogs.
There's another level of crime between attacking private property and an insurrection.
An insurrection is objectively far worst. Empires felt under insurrections. That's not possible by breaking private property.
It is just how things are.
We get it, your biased and when democrats tried to kill trump it wasnt insurrection but when republicans broke into the capitol to take selfies it was... yea we get it :)
@freemo
I am not saying attacks on the white house are good.
They were not taking selfies. They were attacking the capitol.
Do not use whataboutism. It is too Soviet! 😁
