So Reddit sells these uh... "things" for a lot of money so users can add it to some sort of wallet, from that wallet they can click on it so it will bring them to 'their URL' (not) from where the Reddit avatar builders opens and they can add this as their avatar. :ameowsipzoom:
I took the effort to make screenshots so everyone can use them for FREE everywhere 
๐ณ๐ฑ
@stux Wait what, you realize that is illegal to share copyrighted art right? I mean if your aware I dont care go for it, as long as you know this is illegal though (and my put your instance at risk as the mod too)
@nyquildotorg @freemo Hmm good one! I wonder in how far 'screenshots' count.. and when is a screenshot a screenshot 
Has absolutely no relevance here. The fact that it is an NFT doesnt change the nature of the copyright over the image (which is not even transfered as part of the NFT).
Yup, and thats why they retain the right on the copyright.
You seem to be grossly misinformed about what copyright is.. you dont "copyright the image"... images are **automatically** copyrighted by the owner the moment they are created. An owner can give a use license to others if they wish (which is how we handle open source).. but short of that it is copyrighted by default.
NFTs only become legally enforcable if you explicitly write a license that automatically transfers right to use with the NFT. So most NFT you are right, but some can and do transfer ownership.
@jrishel
Well yea, transfering use rights only works if you have the copyright in the first place. So you have to create the art yourself, then offer the license up along with the NFT and set it up so the license transfers witht he NFT int he terms of the license itself. But yea all that is based on a "strong ciopyright" as in you have to clearly have the copyright to start with, and thus be the artist.
@freemo @stux Right, but if you're selling NFTs, which ar meant to replace copyright, why would you copyright the images tied to your tokens?