> no one is coming for your kids dressed in drag - @freemo

@thatguyoverthere You do understand that chant is intended to mock you right?

@freemo Yeah the song too 🙄 My kids are grown ups that know how to think for themselves. You can keep on pretending that there are no bad elements in this and it's all in good fun. It's a weird hill to die on but have at it.

@thatguyoverthere There are bad elements in everything... but no more so in this than anything else.

@freemo sure

@freemo
> You need to take us seriously!
> We're coming for your children 🎶
> No one is coming for your children

@thatguyoverthere right... you claimed they were coming for your children... so they made it a chant to mock you... you really dont get how that works huh? They were making fun of you, and your responding in exactly the way they were making fun of.

@freemo what's funny is that we've had plenty of amicable interactions and I don't think you are stupid, but the second someone disagrees with you it must be because they are dumb, dishonest, [insert ad hominem here].

@thatguyoverthere

I dont recall calling you dumb or dishonest.

@freemo are you serious? 🤣

You said I lied because Google pictures doesn't show you anything like what I did. Then you said I'm dumb because I don't get the stupid joke (I do but there is truth to it which makes it much less funny). There were other more subtle remarks but I really don't care. It's funny is all

@thatguyoverthere i said you lied because you said you picked the first result when you tried to show us how u biased your selection was. Then when you showed a screenshot where it was actually picked as the third option, arbitrarily picking the most questionable of the pictures presented to you.

@freemo dude come on. You accused me of lying before I even posted the screen shot. I corrected myself and said it was 3rd result first row and then you spat out that I confirmed I was lying "because the first one was wholesome" (it's not, low cut front, but it's a bad shot with the person facing away from the camera and the second image didn't load). You literally used a single algorithm by a known influence operation (google) and picked a picture you wanted to counter mine with to suggest that I was being dishonest in the first place (literal cherry pick). The pictures below are just as fucked up I don't really know what you are talking about (the last one is below the fold). I guess I could have picked one of the unrelated pictures of people protesting 🙄.

The more notable ones that hit the news were people like the dick monkey guy or whatever.

This is a meta search engine and instead of thinking maybe we used a different tool you think I am being disingenuous and filtering the results. All of these pictures are places where I would not want my child at a young age. I don't know what google shows you and I really don't care.

@thatguyoverthere

It wasnt the difference of tool, its the fact that the picture was obviously atypical and unlikely to be some arbitrary first result. When you showed the screenshot it cinfirmed it, you had a bunch of pictures and cherry picked, it wasnt the first result as you had claimed it to be.

I used google yes but also my own eyes. Unlike most people before i judge somethi g i tried to go and see it for myself first. I went and viewed a dozen or so of these story times so i coukd judge for myself. None of them were in line with the reality you try to push, a false reality that is either an intentional or unintentional lie, but clearly a lie.

@freemo I'm done arguing. you are trying too hard. It is the first front facing fucking picture. nitpick all you want. I still say the very first pic was just as horrendous. You think it's wholesome you should date it.

@thatguyoverthere however you dice it your still talki g out of your ass from a place of bias and ignirance.