Israel was attacked by armed groups on October 7, and in the months that followed, Israel has attacked Gaza.
Do you think Israel has done enough to protect civilianthe lives in Gaza from October 7 until now?
🇳🇱
1% of the civilian population murdered. Half are children. They have also killed the most journalist in a warzone of any war, reaching a world record.
No what they are doing hasnt just caused many civilians to die, it is literal genocide and has been for a long time, even before the current hostilities.
@greg @freemo @randahl good one. My point still stands. Focus on “civilian deaths” is an attempt to discredit Israel’s right to defend itself. All these argiments are fabricated to guide the narratives to “Israel is bad” instead of having well rounded conversations of what is war and why Hammas spent decades and billions to embed their military instalations into civilian population. If you read war law, this is an actual war crime.
> what question? Could tou [sic] form it more clearly?
This is the question:
> So which sovereign state is the authority that enacted this law that Palestine is bound to that you cite they are violating?
Laws are enacted by governing bodies. International law is enacted by either a governing body (such as the EU) enacting it, in which case the countries that are members are beholden to it, or via treaty. You are claiming Palestine is in violation of international law. So what governing body are they a part of where they violate said law? Or which treaty did they sign which has such law in it?
Clear enough?
god you make less sense every time you post.
Ok so how do you determine what is international law then in this fictional framework of yours? Lets say you have two separate international treaties signed by different parties with opposite and conflicting "international law"... which one is the real law? Say just 2 nations, or 3, or 10 agree to something, is it international law then, how many need to agree before its international law.
And you say **I** have no clue, Ha!
@freemo @greg @randahl thanks for explaining the international law for me. That’s exactly how it is. That’s the essense between unipolar and multipolar worlds. That’s what “western values” mean when we talk about common set of values and norms.