Me and the other directors at my new company have been toying with a new idea, paying people for the work they do on interviews (well sorta).

Basically the idea we are toying with is when we give a programming test as part of the interview we basically offer them the choice of either doing a toy project that has no value to us as a company, or giving them the option to fix any outstanding tickets on one of our open-source projects with a bounty attached to it. This way if your programming test gets accepted you stand a good chance of getting the job AND get paid the bounty.

Programming tests never sat right with me because it seems like a huge time investment to ask of someone who might not get a job. So I wanted to make the process more fair and beneficial to applicants.

Would love to hear what thinks about this.
QT: qoto.org/@freemo/1119111738835

πŸŽ“ Doc Freemo :jpf: πŸ‡³πŸ‡±  
Please reboost! Trying something new, everyone is guaranteed an interview! Open interviews! For a limited time no one will be skipped (except for c...
@freemo why not. but you'd have to check what applicants wrote and this could take more time than you need to fix the problem yourself.
it often happens so with noobs.
but maybe you'd get some people encouraged to bugs bounty hunting without plans to work for you company.
Follow

@iron_bug Our tickets that have bounties are at least a full day worth of work usually. and with open source reviewing submissions is common anyway.

Β· Β· 0 Β· 0 Β· 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.