Follow

You are defending the existence of a completely unnecessary bureaucracy to manage people with low incomes purely because they have a low income, which in this society, is not likely to be down to them as individuals.

I found everything in this statement to be incongruent with reality. It is neccesary, and no i am not saying simply because they are low income, but rather because they are low income and didnt have the financial hygene to save up, so its not just some transient thing, it is due to long-term poor planning/financial hygein.

Adults do not need supervision. Adults should be left to make their own choices and have enough money to make them with, instead of being forced to work for a pittance for other people, for survical.

If they didnt need supervision they would have been able to take care of their own finances. The fact that someone becomes poor is an indication they do not have the proper skills to live a productive adult life, that isnt so much meant to be a judgement against them as it is to address the problem and fix it.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.