If you think Americans with preexisting conditions should pay more for health care coverage, you're going to love the new details of the Trump/Vance approach to health care "reform." https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/vance-signals-new-troubles-preexisting-conditions-rcna171442
@stevebenen If there is one thing that is obvious to me this election its that neither Trump nor Harris have the first clue about what sane healthcare would look like.
No. They both know. Trump doesn't want it because it's unprofitable. Harris doesn't dare propose it because she'll lose the election if she does.
It is the American people who don't have the first clue about what sane health care would look like. And that's also true of the populations of Canada and the UK, which used to have it, and continue to elect politicians who promise to destroy it.
I can't believe our species has survived this long. We clearly don't deserve it.
No. They both know. Trump doesn’t want it because it’s unprofitable. Harris doesn’t dare propose it because she’ll lose the election if she does.
I doubt it. I hav emet very few people who propose sane health care that fixes all the problem. Most either propose universal healthcare, or for-profit, both of which are complete and utter failures. I have met maybe one or two people in my life who actually have a clue about how to do healthcare in a way that doesnt result in either abusive wait times, or abusive costs (and other issues).
It is the American people who don’t have the first clue about what sane health care would look like.
Agreed they dont, nor does Canada, Europe, the UK or anywhere else int he world.
And that’s also true of the populations of Canada and the UK, which used to have it, and continue to elect politicians who promise to destroy it.
facts
I can’t believe our species has survived this long. We clearly don’t deserve it.
yup
And europe, agreed.
Well, now you've got me curious. What, in your estimation, does sane health care look like?
Sane healthcare would be one that addresses both sides of the equation... greed from unregulated for-profit healthcare that drives prices to insane levels due to supply and demand being broken (demand is infinite since people will give everything to live longer). It also needs to address the other side of the coin with highly-regulated universal health care, which is the lack of a free market to drive quality so things like wait times, availible medications, and other issues arise.
There are a few solutions to this but the best one I have heard is co-op based health care. Essentially healthcare where the owners are the patients of the companies they use, and there are no owners otherwise (so all owners are equal owners). When you move to a new healthcare company then you loose ownership in the old one and gain ownership in the new one.
This gives you supply-demand pressures that ensure your healthcare caters to what you want and need (or else loose their funding by patients moving), but keeps prices in check by eliminating the greed factor since any profits go back to the patients and insurance holders themselves.
I do agree that we can better address our supply of doctors. Though my views there are a bit all over the place. For starters if i really had my way completely I would totally take away any authority doctors have. I would make all prescription drugs availible over hte counter. This works quite well in many countries and doctors are now someone you choose to consult rather than whoa re forced to. This would eliminate the need for the AMA.
That said, i dont think id ever convince america to actually trust people to have autonomy over their own bodies, so I doubt that would happen.
The other thing id do regardless of anything else is make all job training, mentorship, tradeschools, and education free to all people at any level (up to and including PhD or medical doctor). That should address the supply issue to some extent.