🇳🇱
Nah, I went into it hoping the numbers would be significant and would be worth discussing. But when you dont compare it to the numbers in other elections you literally are saying nothing of any relevance. I have nothing to even compare to see if its unusual or credible.
I generally assume there is corruption everywhere and most people, are manipulators and idiots, so i would expect election fraud to be very likely. But when i ask for something as simple as the actual numbers so i can evaluate it and i get stupidity cranked up to 11 I am going to quickly dismiss it and move on as i am doing now.
What does this image have to do with one time voters? I didnt ask anything at all about popular votes or even if the election was a fraud, we didnt even get that far. You stated a fact about one time voters... again, where can i see the source of that fact?
Fair enough, if you didnt mean what you said literally and were just trying to say that biden got an unusually high popular vote that is higher than what democrats typically have gotten, then sure. I will be happy to grant you that.
That said it isnt particularly compelling on its own as an argument for election fraud, especially since he only ran once, so we have no idea. I mean if that is the argument used one could say the same aboutn Trump, that he got an unusually high popular vote as well compared to past elections.
@freemo @truthbait this dude thinks he's Socrates, but he's just acting stupid and demanding I prove the obvious. I don't even know what he's doing here or how he glommed on to waste my time but he's one moronic chin scratch away from the mute button.
I didnt demand anything. Now that you explained you didnt actually mean what you were saying and instead just meant "he had an unusually high turnout" I simply agreed with you. The only person insisting on arguing nonsense beyond that is you. I accepted the explanation with no objection.
@freemo @truthbait omg. 15 million isn't unusually high vote count. It's fraud you fat fuck
I see your not too bright. I never said it was or wasnt fraud. Unless your claiming it wasnt unusually high now? You were literally trying to claim it was unusually high and thats your reasoning (or at least part of it) as to why it is fraud, and now your acting like a toddler because I agreed that it was unusually high, lol. Takes a special sorta stupid, I cant even make this shit up.
And again, when you look at the chart from 1900s onward the number is not even at all unusual, it follows exactly the trend of the numbers since the 1900s just fine, almost exactly what you'd expect given the trend. See attached.
@freemo @truthbait no, 'your not too bright'. I'm outta here. Like fuck your stupid little chart. It's basic math. It was always a lie and now it's beyond dispute. Chow chowder
@Soretski @freemo @truthbait What happened in 2020 was statistically impossible. That election was dirtier than a 10¢ whore. Plain as day.
I take it this is like your other statement. You dont actually know the statistical probability and are just saying it to basically mean "man that seems unusual"?
Given the riots at the time, philly was literally on fire, something i never witnessed in my life, it makes perfect sense to me that we saw a record turnout **on both sides**. What i find strange is that despite there being record turnouts on both sides it is only suggestive of fraud on Biden's side.
@freemo @Soretski @truthbait What other statement?
Sorry should have been more clear, I meant the assertion this thread is based on about one-time voters which was not meant literally apparently but to mean "there was a higher than normal turnout" which was true but very different than what was originally said.
@freemo @truthbait I said facetiously that they voted once then never again. In truth there was obvious ballot stuffing to a nuclear (again I don't mean literally) scale. 15 million more votes one election never before, never again. I don't need to debate the obvious, and if you do there's something off about you.