More money spent = less productivity in terms of working with people directly... M=[M x debt] and profit needed. Money = [not the people work]...
More money you spend, worse productivity you are doing working with people directly...
(above a certain amount of comfort or trying to live, just change of the people's mentalities to choose better things to do from there and for better/more measured reasons)...
So with 'fairly minimal' stuff like a Mastodon instance, it is possible to maximise advancing people's mindset and upgrading to better thoughts by talking more often like a therapy to it all of history we have come to absorbing and being aware of.
Mostly as 2 measurable ways to help my statement
(and this is not a rant just logically 2 main things!):
█1.█ Spending money means you are unlikely to be doing the people work (measurable and guesstimated by adding all sectors and how much money goes to humanistic work and how much not. So is it for profit and taking advantage of people (and even war?) or is money for helping consciousness and compassion and perpetuating that to the next generations? <--- LOL you know the answer ! Near 0 or even whatever good cause lesser than this with 'charities' even having to turn over a profit before anything)
█2.█ Money is bad material or:
M=[M x debt]
so = infinite / constant debt?... as a power balance... deliberately?
Quite a shitload of debt
= shitload of depressed people RIGHT?
And overall giving power to others as currency turns everything into tax obviously IS UNcaring / actually help people war using currency/our labour as their main source, even if you can't imagine living almost exactly the same without your government taxing you on everything so heavily.
█ℹ️█ If none of the above makes sense ask yourself if you like Banks or think giving debt is a service to the world an good way of doing things?