With #ClimateChange, many species need to move to survive. Traditionally, they have been called invasive species where they end up, but really they are #ClimateRefugees and are just trying to survive. Is it time to change the term, and is Refugee Species a good one? #ClimateJustice

Follow

"Refugees" seems too much like a political term and less effective... perhaps "displaced" persons as a result of "Globalism" / another attempt to take over so people becomes " abandoned and disconnected " ... ? 

@ainali "Refugees" seems too much like a political term and less effective because of that... and more what others who in are control or luxury might label on others rather than reality of showing the less-than-human attitudes and divisive policies literally and indirectly creating and instigating these sort of "displaced" persons (?)

The terms said don't seem effective to say "someone who has rights" and as equal from beginning wherever they came from. Maybe it is all about economics and that in itself being flawed (the bottom constantly suffering / having to re-shuffle).

"Refugee" seems the economic term for poor person just fleeing mainly...

"Refugee Species" definitely not,
It's not wht they chose or a lab creation someone made or nature creation of a type of species - it's man-made from illness / lack of sharing.

So something to show the force of robbing people's earth is perhaps more neutrally accurate and technical - the " abandoned and disconnected " while could be mentioning in there as the attempted take over by the older people (yet again!) ?

Sorry for not having alternative better but will think on it.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.