We live in an exploitative system.

Many are poor. Or alone. They get used by others

- @KatyElphinstone
/ Thread mas.to/@KatyElphinstone/113497

⬇️ And from same thread... ⬇️

Who benefits?

The status quo. Society. Those who are afraid of change.

=====MY QUESTION =====

ARE YOU AFRAID OF CHANGE?
CONTACT ME EITHER WAY...
ALL THIS ABUSE IS ENOUGH...

WE / YOU JUST NEED TO DO IT YOURSELF... TOGETHER

Follow

@KatyElphinstone It was also question to you Katy!

Can we try trust each other and try test something towards more change even if slowly?

sorry, dark. 

@freeschool @KatyElphinstone
.
That’s my secret, Cap. I’m always angry. No, wait -
That’s THE secret - NOBODY benefits. Even the lives of the rich and powerful suck under this “system.”
.
They still take shit from their elders. Happy people don’t become billionaires, grinding millions under their feet. Nothing they make is what happy people make. The benefits from this “system,” are always over the next hill, after the next trauma, in the next life.

sorry, dark. 

@freeschool @KatyElphinstone
.
I got two blogs, or a blog and a book, it’s not quick, but it’s evolution: spanking and parental control are environments of violence and the children are adapted, make epigenetic choices that make
fighters of them. People talk about Human Nature as if anyone ever gets left alone to develop “naturally,” no-one does.

sorry, dark. 

@punishmenthurts

Yes!!

I've just read a book on 'the female brain' (okay, I knew before reading it was probably not my thing - but it was on the bestsellers list & I wanted to know what was behind that bizarre title!)

The female brain? Uh. Each item of so-called 'evidence' was the result of gender stereotyping & different treatment of male and female.

It was very 'Men are from Mars, Women Are from Venus'.

Makes you wonder about human 'intelligence' 🤷‍♀️

@freeschool

@KatyElphinstone @punishmenthurts or is not an easy , or perhaps ideal to start talking for a new with people (even online), but can I start with asking tentatively and caringly to see more what you think:

Do you think there is no / little difference between and ?

(And I'm not saying I think there is or isn't but just asking to start with...)

@freeschool

I think there is a great deal of difference.

But generally due to very different factors than people think.

I.e. we tend to start with the premise; male & female, and then take it from there.

Where perhaps we should start with other factors.

Such as historical context, power differential, and roles in society.

An example...

@punishmenthurts

#Oppression #Power
#Women #Feminism #Sexism

We talk about 'women's intuition'.

The assumption is that being female makes you more intuitive.

A study was done where people were divided into pairs. Gender was mixed & random. One member of the pair was assigned the 'subordinate' role and the other, the 'leader'.

They did exercises designed to reveal how much they were able to read the thoughts, intentions, & feelings of their partner (this quality is known as 'intuition').

Contd...⬇️

They discovered it had nothing whatever to do with gender. And everything to do with role (specifically, power differential).

The researchers concluded, "perhaps we need to rename 'women's intuition', 'subordinates' intuition'."

After all, it does make a great deal of sense that if you have less power, you need to use intuition a lot more.

It becomes essential to read the other's intentions, feelings, reactions, etc. You could call it a survival thing...

#Heirarchy #Patriarchy

Females have more of a physical ability and therefore role? #male #female #gender related to #role from #physical #ability - giving #birth #breastfeeding #milk by #design 

@KatyElphinstone @punishmenthurts

Yes what you said makes sense in that area.

Perhaps an interesting area of thought connected to gender and role strongly (not totally perhaps) is by each one's physical ability.

The ability of females being able to give birth physically as part of themselves, going through birth itself more personally as potential death for them, giving life more literally to a child, breasts for feeding milk (though man can do this but not in the same way) and a few things below that might be more strongly relate to a 'role' , without any doubt?

That's the TLDR, longer form below.

As the males don't have that ability or option, then they are less likely to have it as a direct role?

Not having child as directly as females, not having breasts that give milk etc... = less of ability to have that role as directly ?

That physicality seems to relate back full-circle to role to a high degree, and seemingly without any doubt (?) since males cannot give birth or give milk physically in the same way (or not even close).

So physically seems evident that gender and role are strongly connected, by design ?

And even if not all females need take it on fully to that extent or role, they have the physical ability where males don't come close.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.