How did we get here, to this point of collapse?
Science subdues nature
"The image of nature that became important in the early modern period was that of a disorderly and chaotic realm to be subdued and controlled ... Wild uncontrollable nature was associated with the female ... Disorderly woman, like chaotic nature, needed to be controlled."
Carolyn Merchant
The Death of Nature
The tech bros think they can control, and through AI, even invent new life.
@gerrymcgovern Another take on it, slightly different points:
- People do give way to aggression
- People do give way to technology or fall for it
(also because they can't see the disadvantages and trick, and they go for advantages first without understanding things)
- Women are not as change-focused or dominating-based (also from inside the current male-domination not easy).
This related to 'carrying' or having more attachment (literally) with baby and perhaps males naturally less so (pollinators). And so carrying 'baggage' make people less mobile to do war (which is also why males maybe don't want people more than nurses and doctors, not CEO or on board of directors) because they might be less inclined for #war which is the #business of most states and firms (#economical war today but similar to 100 years ago World Wars)
- People generally are doing 0 towards change (male/female/anyone) and JUST FOLLOW.
Last note:
- That's maybe part of life and nature, science as well as "science" as mankid's re-packaging of the word as their own agenda(s).
