Jack Dorsey thinking aloud
This time in my course Calling Bullshit, we spent more time than ever before talking about AI, algorithms, etc.
Sadly, our final exam in my course it was last week. Otherwise, the first question would have been to discuss the highlighted claim below, "moderation is best implemented by algorithmic choice."
https://www.getrevue.co/profile/jackjack/issues/a-native-internet-protocol-for-social-media-1503112
Jack Dorsey thinking aloud
I initially intended just to put this up as a sort of Rorschach exercise, but people keep asking my thoughts.
I think that Dorsey has got the right solution to the wrong problem.
By algorithmic choice, he seems to be referring to letting people individually choose the algorithms that control the content that they see. (And if I read what is below correctly, he's implicitly saying that his Twitter should have let you leave your feed in chronological mode.)
Jack Dorsey thinking aloud
I've been a strong proponent of this idea not only in platform design but also as a potential regulatory requirement for existing social media platforms.
I would love to see Facebook, Twitter, etc, opened up to the use of third-party algorithms instead of the platform default. Require this, and immediately big competitors all enter with their versions. The open source community follows. Small for-profits meet needs of niche markets. Etc.
Jack Dorsey thinking aloud
@ct_bergstrom Do you think there should be a single set of global moderation rules? Or, e.g., country specific or language specific rules?