Lawyer cited 6 fake cases made up by ChatGPT; judge calls it “unprecedented”
Judge weighs punishment for lawyer who didn't bother to verify ChatGPT output.
@arstechnica '... he asked the AI tool whether Varghese is a real case. ChatGPT answered that it "is a real case" ... When asked if the other cases provided by ChatGPT are fake, it answered, "No, the other cases I provided are real and can be found in reputable legal databases such as LexisNexis and Westlaw." '
If accurate, to me this illustrates the core of the issue with many people's use of so-called #AI tools: this lawyer bought the hype that these #LLM are verging on human-like intelligence and could understand and answer his question, while in reality they were only constructing a statistically probable sequence of words that might be written in response to such a query, with no relationship to the facts of the matter.
