@jerlich
Welp. There's another journal I won't review for.
Peer review is not commentary. Peer review is an INTERNAL process for the authors to make their work better and editors to make the judgement of whether to gatekeep* the paper in their journal. It should only be of interest to historians of science. I do not write my peer reviews for public consumption.
* If you don't like gatekeeping, then you should do your science by systems that don't gatekeep, such as preprints.