@jerlich

Welp. There's another journal I won't review for. 😢

Peer review is not commentary. Peer review is an INTERNAL process for the authors to make their work better and editors to make the judgement of whether to gatekeep* the paper in their journal. It should only be of interest to historians of science. I do not write my peer reviews for public consumption.

* If you don't like gatekeeping, then you should do your science by systems that don't gatekeep, such as preprints.