@kashi
My apologies for being unclear. I meant that the literal existence of a god is not scientific because it cannot be disproved; however, the effects that arise from a personal belief and relationship with divinity, the universe, infinity, etc are very much disprovable, which is to say that an alternative hypothesis can be reliably compared against a null hypothesis. The scientific method cannot be used to *prove* anything, it can only be used to find if there is evidence to *disprove*, and when that evidence is sufficiently and reliably lacking, then what is being investigated can be thought of as sound.

My apologies if all of the above is something you're already well familiar with, I don't know the details of your background