@alexandra
Won't all space communication be via satellite? Assuming owning a satellite would be cheap If made/deployed in space- I imagine space internet would be the final frontier for the internet.
@lucifargundam@qoto.org It takes between about 4 and about 24 minutes to send signals between Mars and Earth, regardless of how you do it. As a result, it's not tractable to view a Web page hosted on Earth from Mars (the round-trip time is of course twice the one-way time), so for the Web to be usable on an interplanetary scale at least one copy has to be hosted on each planet.
Even running servers in several geographic locations on Earth is more difficult than running just one, when you factor in the effort of making sure changes on one server stay in sync on the others and/or deploying code and content changes to all of them in a reasonably seamless manner.
Of course, the reality is there will be services that abstract this, just like we have CDNs and serverless cloud now. But it'll still be significantly more expensive than IPFS/Dat.
@alexandra
Sounds like space internet is only efficient for local content- having a space colony out by Uranus wouldn't hardly bother with Earth news as much as they would near Neptune.
Terrans:: "Damn martians- thinking they're beyond our control just because they've gone several generations without Earth regulated military-backed government!"
"Uh sir, these ones aren't from Mars..."
"I know that! But we can't call them aliens or extraterrestrials! That makes them sound like new intelligent life rather than stupid rebels!"
@lucifargundam@qoto.org It depends on how much bandwidth is available; if it's a decent amount, maybe you can afford to beam the latest news stories out to the colonies a few times a day so people can read them off your newspaper's local Web server on their particular planet.