Good look at a bad problem. The author is a friend from grad schol at the of , where she was a faculty member when I was a grad student. She's since gone on to bigger and better things, and I've gone on to ... well, things.

Anyway. I've never been particularly worried about , , etc. Humans doing stupid human tricks, and using to do them much faster, OTOH, yeah.

The internet community of anti-science is an example of happening at human speed. , , change et al. prey on people with legitimate questions about some particular aspect of the broad . Those people often go down an increasingly loony rabbit hole, and end up propagating the absurdity, sometimes adding their own bizarre spin which their new-found colleagues happily add to the ideology.

If this becomes part of the ecosystem, with AI reviewers approving AI-generated and no human checks on the process, the scholarly corpus will become hopelessly contaminated. I have no idea what to do about that.

theconversation.com/a-new-ai-s

Follow

@rubinjoni It's been a while since I read the Dune novels, but wasn't the Jihad against AIs themselves? As much as I enjoy Terminator and Battlestar Galactica, like I said I'm not really worried about the machines turning against us. Just humans doing really dumb things with them.

@medigoth It's just a world building thing: complete taboo on "thinking machines" (effectively, all computers), so certain people must be specially trained to perform demanding computational tasks. And they need the lsd/oil that can only be found on a single planet. Mentats and space navigators. The actual "war on computers" is just mentioned as something in the distant past.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.