@soundwave natural selection is eugenics, you cracked it einstein
@soundwave I'm not accepting your bizarre implications and no amount of wordplay can change that, I'm simply pointing out that you have not a slightest clue what natural selection or eugenics or healthcare mean.
There is no healthcare in nature, its absence is natural, its goal is to ensure the survival of the individuals regardless of their natural ability. Eugenics is the exact opposite in concept, the aim is to prevent all potential health issues at conception and ultimately deprecate healthcare. Henceforth, the population that can't afford healthcare is not subject to eugenics, as it is subject to natural selection, and population that can afford it is still not subject to eugenic, as healthcare is opposite of eugenics.
It should also be apparent to anyone that actually studies biology, that eugenics (along with whatever twisted notions of "finest stock" or "elite gene pool" you might have) is an entirely degenerate idea and will never work and there are no upshots to it.
@namark
No. Natural selection becomes twisted and perverted into Unnatural selection, if money is involved. I thought I'd made that perfectly clear, Einstein.