Talking about as in bringing it up as an idea.

Show thread

Liberato's marketing is curious. They simultaneously say they won't take down content unless it is legal (and consensual as in sex) but they simultaneously have a policy against hate speech.

Legal by which standards? U.S. Law?

What if I take a thousand photos of squirrels, train a model off it, and try to turn it into something grotesque? Is that magically bad because it involved "AI"?

Show thread

The end user and the technology itself is actually a rather uninteresting thing here.

If someone takes issue with it, it likely has more to do with a few large companies sweeping the web.

Show thread

I'm also once again annoyed by people who use the term "AI" as a sort of vague jargon. Usage of porn isn't inherently "bad" simply because it popped out of the rear end of a diffusion model. Someone isn't suddenly evil because they used a particular technology.

Show thread

I wish someone would defend someone's right to do something properly rather than overwhelmingly framing it through a utilitarian lens (only thing that matters is that porn decreases crime, rather than any other positive use of porn) and talking about putting porn onto illegal sites.

Looks like Bluesky has geoblocked 72 accounts in Turkey.

Up to 93% of hits in the "Lantern" program might not involve real child exploitation, according to their own terms. Someone should look into that.

It is very concerning that these companies try to use language to try to human rights wash it.

It's worth noting that it's also a form of protest, so it's also an attack on protest.

Olives  
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/18/hungary-bans-pride-events-and-plans-to-use-facial-recognition-to-target-attenders Hungary bans pride ...
Olives boosted

qoto.org/@olives/1133616369229 Goes over things like porn, science, tech, human rights. A critique of censorship, prohibition, puritanism.

I've taken a step away from social media lately but I might expand on this sometime as it's been a while.

Olives boosted

qoto.org/@olives/1133616369229 As there are bad takes in , here's the piece again. Goes over things like porn, science, tech, human rights. A critique of censorship, prohibition, puritanism. It's been a while since the last update, I might expand on it further sometime.

Olives boosted

Such as whether they are securing things properly, particularly if they're handling sensitive information like this. Also, the information probably shouldn't be processed outside of that context.

Goodness, to condemn AI which they dislike, someone might talk like a freakin puritan.

Show thread

Framing it as a matter of "AI" doesn't make complaining about sexual fantasies, or particular sexual fantasies more compelling than if it involves a book or other literature.

There are questions about AI here, of course.

A blog is one of the easiest things to self-host. I personally think Substack and Medium are overrated.

Gauging the presence of content based on search results is silly considering that a search result can linger for weeks after something is deleted.

One of my Substack pet peeves is having to click through that thing welcoming someone to the blog rather than just taking you to a list of posts.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.