Early last year, Elon tried to push an idea that he was some sort of principled free speech figure.

We have seen significant evidence that he is not.

We have seen significant evidence that he has wrongly suspended anime themed accounts for no reason whatsoever, although considering the number of conspiratorial nutcases he surrounds himself with, perhaps he doesn't need a real reason.

Elon has censored keywords related to mainstream LGBT content, such as "bisexual". Why? No one knows.

If we consider that other companies, such as Patreon, are doing similar things, it might be pressure to suppress pornography from religious groups.

Why on earth would a "free speech absolutist" be taking directions from them?

Elon Musk has kowtowed to authoritarians. Turkey. India.

He berated the previous management for taking the "shocking" step of taking legal action against the Modi Regime's censorship.

He did this as a "get out of jail card" when he wanted to get out of acquiring the company by claiming that Twitter were jeopardizing their own ability to operate in India.

This was always a silly claim. In the context of looking for a perfunctory excuse to back out of a deal, it didn't seem so bad.

Elon has granted far more censorship requests from governments than the previous management ever did, even if we think that they could have or should have pushed back more on requests.

When journalists rubbed him the wrong way, Elon's staff looked for excuses to suspend their accounts.

Elon appears to loath people posting photos of him with Ghislaine Maxwell. He censors that too.

While I imagine Ghislaine, as a socialite fraternized with many powerful people, and he is extremely unlikely to be part of a "cabal", it is thin skinned.

Suppressing links to competing companies was problematic. A practice which might actually be illegal, and which offended his own VC friends.

Elon also stopped consulting, among other civil society groups, the Center for Democracy and Technology. For a so-called "free speech absolutist", it is interesting that he doesn't consult with any free speech groups.

Ella Irwin, Head of Trust & Safety, more or less signalled she would stop doing impact assessments to make sure that people aren't unfairly censored by moderation changes.

Yes, the "free speech absolutist" who made a point about how if in doubt he would lean towards speech, is far worse about that than the previous management.

Seemingly, the only speech he does protect is that of a few odious public figures.

Even that has a dodgy history, such as his "I know it when I see it" approach to moderation with Kanye West.

It's not unusual for a site to have a policy against Nazi symbolism. It is nonetheless unusual to make a point about being a free speech absolutist and to quickly strike someone down.

His moderation rationale boils down to "take down the bad content and keep up the good content". He doesn't seem to understand that everyone has a different idea of what this should be, and he lacks any sort of coherent principles in this regard.

Elon appears to be censoring dark humor. So much for the "anti-woke" warrior who is sick of people trampling on "fun".

There are many ways in which Elon is anything but the free speech warrior he portrays himself to be.

Posing as a free speech warrior is a fairly common grift for some nowadays.

It allows someone to feign outrage about people being "cancelled" without actually taking substantive action to provide people with a platform for free expression.

If anything, some of the biggest "free speech" grifters appear to be the biggest censors. How about that.