I saw a very strange take.
Someone wrote a literal hit piece about the fediverse, cherry-picking posts from *January*, using unreliable algorithms, and still making the fediverse look, in practical terms, clear of actual child porn (even where there might be a problem).
But, then, they were like...
Defederation is a blunt instrument. If an instance has something you believe to be real child porn, and they don't take it down, we shouldn't be in the business of blocking instances, we should just block that one post.
???
He probably just wants more material to write about.
He probably loves Facebook (and Big Tech) as it's an endless spring of material that he can mine, complain about, to, and philosophize about.
Also, there is a whole lot of arguing / talking with a committee about some little minutia.
It's not as simple as "okay, so if someone deliberately runs a real child porn node, we will cut them off".