"If my proposal is not adopted, we face a complete ban of the detection of child sexual abuse when the temporary legislation that allows it expires next year."

Ylva keeps repeating this lie but repeating a lie doesn't make it true. The Parliament could easily extend this particular carve-out (although, there are those who think that such a carve-out is also problematic from a privacy perspective).

Still, from a political perspective, if she thinks she can get her authoritarian proposal passed, then it should be easy to get an extension for this passed. Ylva is the one who insists on only pushing her own proposal.

Also, the Commission (which includes Ylva) was presumably part of the process which led to the current temporary derogation.