https://stallman.org/articles/extreme.html

If the text is still the same, it is... troublesome...

For instance, what if someone was to use a model to generate a sexual scene involving a corpse? Also, how realistic is "realistic"?

The mere existence of this law is also quite questionable. It appears to have been passed over highly dubious concerns of whether it "leads to more violence"...

"The concept of "sexual interference with a human corpse" is curious. All a corpse can do on its own is decay, so the only possible "interference" is to prevent its decay. Thus, "sexual interference" rationally would mean some sexual activity while injecting embalming fluid, or while putting the corpse into a refrigerator. However, I doubt that the censors interpret this term rationally. They will have cooked up an excuse for some twisted interpretation that enables them to punish more people."

Richard is so funny. I thought of citing something else but this take is more... interesting.