I'm going to take a guess and say that interest in ChatGPT may not be high enough for developers at the moment. So, they decided to do the one sure fire way to create additional interest: https://www.npr.org/2024/05/08/1250073041/chatgpt-openai-ai-erotica-porn-nsfw
@freezenet https://qoto.org/@olives/112402648186219830 Ironically, I spoke about something like this the other day (in the context of a U.S. consultation).
Don't you find the hypotheticals in this article a bit silly? Someone is not allowed to play with the robot because of the imagined threat that someone might orchestrate a "romance scam" (which they could do anyway)?
It feels like someone is looking for an excuse to be upset about "AI". If they don't like the tech, at least be honest as to why.
It would probably be more interesting for erotica than actual proper porn, in any case. You also don't know how broadly they construe sexually suggestiveness, it can be pretty mundane nowadays.
I'm not holding out hope for OpenAI to implement it without being fussy about what "proper sex looks like" which would probably make it rather dull.
@olives I'm personally thinking that if ChatGPT were to implement something like this, it would be, well, awkward more than anything else. I mean, I've seen 6 fingered people in AI images, badly written legal documents in AI generated documents, poorly written news articles generated by AI, and plenty of other things that make AI hype overblown, so I'm not sure AI "erotica" is going to be any different.
Credit where credit is due, though, I heard AI translations are very well done.
@freezenet I dunno, I've seen people speaking more positively about "AI" (artificial "intelligence") erotica, perhaps because it is more interactive, although that was a few years ago. I can't say whether it is of particularly high quality though.
I think that "AI" art can get pretty boring, maybe a few pieces as a novelty, but otherwise human art tends to be far more interesting. Then again, if someone likes that, then that's cool for them.
