In fact, I think there is a large newspaper in the U.K. which used to put a topless 16 year old in one of the first pages. This happened decades ago (the law on that has since been changed), but it's not implausible that the "child porn" points could apply to that.

So, then, someone might be treated as a "current offender" by the grifter in the statistics for flicking through a major newspaper back then.