Now, I see a user spreading disinformation (representing speculation pulled out of their ass as "fact").
For instance, they are misrepresenting a case about someone being convicted for child abuse as being about "art". There were due process concerns with this case, which raised Sixth Amendment issues, however, it was not as painted here. Plus, it involved the Fifth Circuit which has been doing bizarre things lately. These were not the only issues at play here.
It is also important to remember that sexual content depicting a particular minor is *not* protected by the First Amendment (although, it would require intent). There have been a few cases like that.
Misinformation like this can be troublesome. Please don't spread it.
Most importantly, be wary of speculating. For instance, one case which was assumed to be about cartoons actually seemed to involve something "photorealistic", if you actually dug into the court records.