I see someone is still arguing about "MSC" being properly run, despite the "13+ chat group" marketing.

If he's aiming to advance civil liberties though, that *one point* has single-handedly made him the object of *scandal* for no real good reason. It is nothing but a shackle. He could have removed it years ago, especially after it was abundantly clear that it was a no-go.

Is this the Concorde Effect? Because, it's hard to imagine why someone insists on making the same stupid talking points.