https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/eff-statement-metas-announcement-revisions-its-content-moderation-processes The EFF might have goofed by "applauding" it (it would presumably result in fewer erroneous takedowns / demotions) in a post without considering the political heat from other decisions.
Not in this post, but in a post linking to this post.
I think there was a missed opportunity here for the EFF to point to *many examples* of unreasonable takedowns.
Follow
The article could have a better structure, they could introduce the issues at play, then how this kind of direction (lowering the error rate) could be positive for expression.
