He's been known too donate to groups that'd have lgbt rights removed and publicly hated the legislation of gay marriage
Also for selling you crappy crypto pennys
and then kinda lieing to you that their giving it to creators (they hold onto it intill the creator signs up to it)
Care to reply to the rest too and not only on accepting cryptocurrencies (the only thing they retracted after community outcry)? Are you really OK with what Mozilla became in the recent years? I am not.
There is LibreWolf if you want to promote the diversity of web engines without supporting Mozilla.
Also just opened Twitter to check Firefox profile and found a very bad thing:
https://twitter.com/firefox/status/1612503975479152645
They just promoted VPNs as something "private". There is nothing private about a VPN provider, the acronym stands for the technology involved not to the service.
Very bad for Mozilla that once promoted privacy on the Web.
Also Mozilla VPN is pretty good like not perfect but pretty good if you understand what vpns do and don't do
Since it's using mullvad as the backend with a nicer ui
No, sorry, promoting VPN providers as private is something I can't tolerate from Mozilla.
also I've used librewolf before been watching it since it started
Librewolf it is just Firefox with preaplyed config that breaks a bunch of sites that's all
That's all you can also do everything librewolf does in less then 10mins with https://ffprofile.com/ so there's no point in me using or recommend it long term
It's way easier to just install LibreWolf. Many people need an "install" icon. LibreWolf is on FlatHub so it's a great choice for Linux users.
Also no Mozilla branding, no more trademarked Firefox.
Also firefox dosnt brake alot of sites by default so it ends up in about the same not less amount of effort to use Firefox with a config than to use librewolf
I was talking about using https://ffprofile.com/ in less then 10 min etc vs clicking "install" for LibreWolf.
If you read more carefully maybe...
Sorry, I just wanted to understand people who are OK with Mozilla but not with Brave.
Like, Mozilla are the good guys and Brave the bad ones... come on...
This is not about Firefox, it's about from where Mozilla takes money, how they use them and questionable decisions like buying Pocket, promise to make it Open Source but instead keeping it proprietary and poorly integrating it in Firefox with multiple flags needed to disable it.
Then there is the decision of not turning Gecko in something that can compete with CEF and the reasons we have so many Chromium-based browsers.
There is the decision of giving up on (real) PWA for desktop despite Mozilla promoted the concept ante literam even with a Web based mobile OS.
And I can go on for a while... Mozilla has become a disgrace for Firefox in the recent years, way worse for us than Brave that is just another Chromium-based browser.
No I won't I like Mozilla, what they are doing and were their taking their projects
(AlsonI don't see accepting crypto as a donation as a bad thing but as accessibility thing not every can/wants to use paypal for donations)
why would I criticise a person
or group for doing what id like them to do??